Last summer, residents of Roma and Condesa, the central neighborhoods that remote workers have made their own, told Left Voice their rents now run 23,000 to 30,000 pesos a month, roughly 1,200 to 1,600 dollars, and that the climb has forced longtime neighbors out. Those are figures residents reported, not an official average, and they sit under the single line Fodor's published about my hometown in November.

Fodor's Travel put Mexico City on its 2026 No List, one of eight destinations it asked travelers to reconsider. What is notable is what the entry does not say. There is no security warning, no cartel, none of the usual American anxiety about Mexico. Fodor's pointed instead to the July 2025 gentrification protests, to short-term rentals and foreign remote workers, and to softer cultural complaints: more English on the street, restaurants toning down the spice. The company called the list a nudge, not a boycott. Its Digital Editorial Director, Jeremy Tarr, described it in the announcement as "a reality check wrapped in responsible wanderlust." I read that phrase from Berlin, where I now pay the rent, and thought the reality was older and duller than any check.

Here is the structure under the costume. In October 2022, Claudia Sheinbaum, then the mayor and now the president, signed an agreement with Airbnb and UNESCO to sell the city as a global hub for digital nomads. Airbnb, for its part, says it generated more than a billion dollars in the local economy last year, and that its guests spend in shops and services too. The deal did not start the conversion of the city's housing; it blessed one already well underway, and the city would lean into it again when the World Cup came.

By Inside Airbnb's count, reported by Urbanet, the number of temporary rentals in the city climbed from 22,122 to 71,780 over the past decade, much of it before Sheinbaum ever signed. Her denial, per El País, is essentially this: the conversion predates her deal and outruns it. Fair enough. But it has not slowed since. Three apartments now leave the long-term market for short lets every 48 hours, by El País and Inside Airbnb's reckoning. Airbnb alone lists more than 26,500 listings in the city, clustered in Roma, Condesa, Juárez, and Polanco.

This is not a mystery of taste or a clash of cultures, whatever the complaints about English menus and under-spiced food. It is a price signal. The digital nomad is not a villain. He is a salary the local market cannot match, sitting in an apartment that used to house someone who earned in pesos.

I should say plainly that I got this wrong once. In 2020 I wrote that remote work would loosen geography's grip on class. It did the opposite. It handed the comfortable a second city and handed everyone else a longer commute to it.

The anger arrived on schedule. On July 4, 2025, hundreds marched from Parque México, the leafy square at the heart of Condesa, down toward the old US embassy on Reforma, the city's main boulevard. Some of the graffiti was ugly, "Kill the Gringos" and "Death to Airbnb," and Sheinbaum condemned the xenophobic edge of it, correctly. But the signs that mattered read "Housing regulations now." Twelve days later, Mayor Clara Brugada announced a 14-point plan capping rent increases at inflation and promising a rental law. The city already had an Airbnb Law from 2024 limiting short lets to 180 nights a year, but court challenges have suspended it and the broader rent reform is parked until after the tournament, leaving some 274,000 World Cup rental nights unregulated.

Which is where the tournament comes in, as proof rather than cause. For years the government promised the 2026 World Cup would bring 5.5 million additional international visitors; Mexico City hosted five matches, including the opener. The number was a fantasy, and the forecasters said so in advance: Moody's Local México put the likely turnout near 768,000. Now that the games are nearly done, the real figures are worse. A study by the business council CNET and Anáhuac's tourism center puts the additional international arrivals at around 175,000, roughly three percent of the promise; Banamex measured the economic spillover at about two billion dollars, a tenth of one percent of national output. The city told the world to reconsider, then bet its housing calendar on a flood that never came.

So what does visiting responsibly look like. The honest answer is that it looks like very little, if you mean it as a personal virtue. Stay in a hotel instead of an Airbnb, learn some Spanish, tip in pesos: fine, do all of it, none of it moves the structure. The 180-night cap moves the structure, and its timing reads, to me, like a measure written to protect the very rents it claims to restrain. The No List asks you to feel something. The more useful request is to notice who set the price, and when, and who signed the deal. In this case it was the same person now running the country.